The Best Zapier & Make Agencies for Healthcare in 2026
Ranking updated 1 September 2026Listings reviewed 30 August 20265 agencies reviewedHow we rank
Healthcare automation is constrained before it is technical: patient data rules out most consumer tooling and shapes where anything can be hosted. The agencies below have worked inside those constraints.
Every agency below appears in our full zapier & make agencies ranking and states healthcare organizations among the sectors it works with. Listings are ordered by their position in that ranking.
Australian and Asia Pacific mid-market teams rolling out monday.com or Atlassian who need the surrounding integrations, adoption and support handled by the same firm.
Sydney, AU
Not published
Undisclosed
The full reviews
The table is the summary. Below, every agency gets the complete assessment: what it is genuinely good at, where it falls short, and the facts behind its position.
Best forBuyers who want a senior operator's hands on the build and can absorb a $200 to $300 hourly rate from a small team.
Top choice
Connex Digital fits a buyer who wants the founder's own hands on the build and can live with a rate at the top of this category's range. A 2010 founding date, a named principal, a published headcount band and a Zapier Expert of the Year designation are more than most listings here offer, and the Clutch rate card of $200 to $300 an hour with a $1,000 minimum lets a buyer size an engagement before making contact. The pressure point is capacity against price. Its own site names six people while its Clutch profile claims 10 to 49, and a premium hourly rate on a bench that small means little cover if one person is unavailable. Its Clutch profile also carries no reviews, so the only substantial review base for it sits in the Zapier directory, which is not a source this directory publishes and cannot count toward a rank. Fifth reflects a firm that is transparent on price and history but unevidenced on outcomes.
Pros
Publishes an hourly rate of $200 to $300 with a $1,000 minimum, one of the few rate cards findable in this category
Named a Zapier Expert of the Year, a designation from the platform rather than a tier the agency assigned itself
Trading since 2010 under a named principal, with a stated pivot to automation work only
Cons
The $200 to $300 hourly rate sits on a bench its own site puts at six people, which will stretch on a multi-workstream program
Headcount contradicts across sources: six people named on its own site against a self-reported 10 to 49 on Clutch
Its Clutch profile carries no reviews, so nothing in a source this directory accepts speaks to delivery quality
Best forBuyers with a specific broken or half-finished Zapier build who want one experienced person on it rather than a team.
Luhhu is worth contacting for one specific job: a Zapier build that is broken, or one a previous supplier abandoned half-finished. That is work most agencies would rather not quote on, and a single experienced Zapier partner is arguably the right shape for it. Everything else about the engagement argues for caution on anything larger. It is one person on one platform, so there is no continuity cover and no capacity for parallel workstreams, its Zapier tier is Gold rather than the Platinum most partners here hold, and it publishes no founding year and no rate. The site does not redirect to HTTPS, and the blog now carries syndicated content unrelated to automation, which reads more like link monetization than an active consultancy. Thirteenth is about the thinness of the record and the concentration risk, not a judgment on the Zapier work itself.
Pros
Zapier Gold Solution Partner, a tier listed in Zapier's own expert directory
Explicitly takes on repair work: fixing broken zaps and finishing builds another supplier abandoned
Publishes a named principal, a city and a UK trading entity
Cons
One person on one platform, so there is no cover if the principal is unavailable and no capacity for parallel workstreams
The blog now carries syndicated content unrelated to automation, which reads as link monetization rather than an active practice
No founding year and no rate are published, and the site does not redirect to HTTPS
Gold is a lower Zapier tier than the Platinum most of the Zapier partners listed here hold
Best forSmall businesses that want a free process audit first and a builder who is not tied to a single automation platform.
Alltomate is a reasonable shortlist entry for a small business that wants a builder unattached to one platform: Zapier, Make.com, n8n, Lindy.ai and Viasocket in the same stack is genuinely broad, the Zapier Platinum tier is listed in Zapier's directory rather than merely asserted, and a free process audit is a low-cost way to test the working relationship. What holds it at tenth is that a buyer has nothing else to check. There is no published location, no founding year, no headcount and no rate, so jurisdiction, tenure, capacity and cost are all unknown until contact, and the 172 companies and 1,507 workflows figures are self-reported with no named client behind them. The 5.0 shown on its site cites no platform at all. For a $5,000 decision that is a lot of trust extended before the first meeting.
Pros
Zapier Platinum Solution Partner, a tier listed in Zapier's own expert directory rather than self-assigned
Builds in Zapier, Make.com, n8n, Lindy.ai and Viasocket, so the platform choice is not settled in advance
Offers a free business process audit as the first step
Cons
Publishes no location, no founding year, no headcount and no rate, so a buyer can verify nothing about the company before contact
The 5.0 shown on its own site names no review platform and appears in no source this directory accepts
Its intake form's lowest budget band starts at $1,000, indicating SMB-scale work rather than capacity for a large program
Best forSmall Australian businesses that want Zapier workflows plus the reporting layer over them from one hands-on consultant.
That Automation Agency is a sensible option for a small Australian business that wants Zapier workflows plus the Power BI reporting layer over them from one accountable person, and the fractional COO line means it will engage with the operating process rather than just building zaps. Its Zapier Platinum tier is listed in Zapier's directory and its ABN is published, so both the credential and the trading entity check out, which is more than several listings above it manage. The limits are concentration on two axes at once. It presents as a single principal with no published headcount, so there is no cover if that person is unavailable, and the stack is Zapier plus Power BI with no Make.com or n8n, so it cannot compare platforms on a buyer's behalf. No founding year, city or rate is published either, leaving tenure, location and budget to the first call. Twelfth reflects a narrow and largely unevidenced public record.
Pros
Zapier Platinum Solution Partner with a published ABN, so both the credential and the trading entity can be checked
Pairs automation with Power BI dashboards, so the reporting layer comes out of the same engagement
Offers fractional COO time, which is process ownership rather than build and leave
Cons
Presents as a single-principal consultancy with no published headcount, so there is no cover if that person is unavailable
The stack is Zapier plus Power BI with no Make.com or n8n, so it cannot compare platforms on a buyer's behalf
No founding year, city or rate is published, and the claim to be the first APAC Certified Zapier Expert is its own
Best forAustralian and Asia Pacific mid-market teams rolling out monday.com or Atlassian who need the surrounding integrations, adoption and support handled by the same firm.
Fruition Services fits an Australian or Asia Pacific mid-market team putting in monday.com or Atlassian and needing the integrations, user adoption and ongoing support from the same supplier. The monday.com Platinum tier and the 2026 Rising Star award are recognition from the vendor rather than self-assertion, and the managed services and change management lines mean somebody stays accountable after go-live, which most listings here do not offer. The reason it does not rank higher in a Zapier and Make.com category is that monday.com is the anchor: automation arrives as part of a work-management practice, so a buyer wanting deep Make.com scenario engineering may find it a secondary competence. Its Make.com Gold tier is its own claim, unverifiable because Make's partner directory returns nothing to a check, and no founding year, headcount or rate is published anywhere.
Pros
monday.com Platinum partner with a Rising Star award from the 2026 partner summit, both awarded by the vendor
Sells change management, adoption and managed services around the build, so the engagement does not end at go-live
Publishes an HQ city, which most of this category does not
Cons
monday.com is the anchor practice, so Make.com and Zapier work arrives as part of a work-management rollout rather than as the main event
The Make.com Gold tier is self-stated and could not be verified; Make's partner directory renders client-side and returned nothing when checked
No founding year, headcount or rate is published, so scale and cost are unknowable before contact
