The Best Zapier & Make Agencies for Ecommerce in 2026
Ranking updated 1 September 2026Listings reviewed 30 August 20266 agencies reviewedHow we rank
Ecommerce automation spans order operations, support triage, returns and merchandising data. The agencies below have worked with the platform and fulfilment stack rather than only the marketing layer.
Every agency below appears in our full zapier & make agencies ranking and states ecommerce businesses among the sectors it works with. Listings are ordered by their position in that ranking.
Mid-market and enterprise buyers who need Make.com and n8n work from a team with ISO 27001 certification, named large-company references and a rate published in third-party directories.
Small Australian businesses that want Zapier workflows plus the reporting layer over them from one hands-on consultant.
AU
Not published
Undisclosed
The full reviews
The table is the summary. Below, every agency gets the complete assessment: what it is genuinely good at, where it falls short, and the facts behind its position.
Best forMid-market and enterprise buyers who need Make.com and n8n work from a team with ISO 27001 certification, named large-company references and a rate published in third-party directories.
Makeitfuture is the pick for a buyer who has to justify the choice to someone else. It publishes an HQ, a founding year, a headcount band, ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and a named client list including Decathlon and PepsiCo, and it is the only agency here carrying a rating from a source this directory accepts, though that DesignRush score rests on six reviews and is thin evidence on its own. The weaknesses are platform gravity and spread: the Platinum tier and both awards are Make.com anchored, so expect a Make-first recommendation rather than neutral advice, and a service menu running from chatbots to ERP migration to workshops across a three-country operation makes depth in any one line hard to judge from outside. Its own site still publishes no rates, and its founding year disagrees across three sources. It ranks first because on the two things that matter most in this category, work you can check and prices you can find, it gives a buyer more to verify than anything below it.
Pros
Names large commercial clients including Decathlon, PepsiCo, Celonis and easyHotel, which no other listing here does
Holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification, the only information security certification on this page
Rates are findable in third-party directories at $80 an hour with minimum budgets from $1,000
Works across Make.com, n8n, Zapier and Airtable rather than a single platform
Cons
The Make.com Platinum tier is the agency's own claim; Make's partner directory renders client-side and returned nothing when checked
Its own site publishes no rates at all; the $80 an hour figure comes from a DesignRush profile, not from the agency
The founding year is given as 2019 on its own site, 2020 on Clutch and 2021 on DesignRush
The service menu runs from chatbots to ERP migration to training workshops, a wide surface for a team in the 11 to 50 band
HQ
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Team
11-50
Pricing
$80/hr and $1,000-$10,000 minimum budget (DesignRush); $1,000-$25,000+ (Airtable partner directory)
Best forBuyers who want a senior operator's hands on the build and can absorb a $200 to $300 hourly rate from a small team.
Top choice
Connex Digital fits a buyer who wants the founder's own hands on the build and can live with a rate at the top of this category's range. A 2010 founding date, a named principal, a published headcount band and a Zapier Expert of the Year designation are more than most listings here offer, and the Clutch rate card of $200 to $300 an hour with a $1,000 minimum lets a buyer size an engagement before making contact. The pressure point is capacity against price. Its own site names six people while its Clutch profile claims 10 to 49, and a premium hourly rate on a bench that small means little cover if one person is unavailable. Its Clutch profile also carries no reviews, so the only substantial review base for it sits in the Zapier directory, which is not a source this directory publishes and cannot count toward a rank. Fifth reflects a firm that is transparent on price and history but unevidenced on outcomes.
Pros
Publishes an hourly rate of $200 to $300 with a $1,000 minimum, one of the few rate cards findable in this category
Named a Zapier Expert of the Year, a designation from the platform rather than a tier the agency assigned itself
Trading since 2010 under a named principal, with a stated pivot to automation work only
Cons
The $200 to $300 hourly rate sits on a bench its own site puts at six people, which will stretch on a multi-workstream program
Headcount contradicts across sources: six people named on its own site against a self-reported 10 to 49 on Clutch
Its Clutch profile carries no reviews, so nothing in a source this directory accepts speaks to delivery quality
Best forEcommerce and logistics teams running high-volume Make.com or n8n workflows where reliability matters more than a Zapier partnership.
Value Added Tech suits a team already committed to Make.com or n8n and running enough volume that reliability is the deciding factor. The stated 1.2 million tasks at 99.8% uptime is at least framed around the thing that actually goes wrong with production automation, and AWS in the stack suggests it can go past what a no-code platform does alone. Three things keep it at eleventh. It publishes no location anywhere on its site, so jurisdiction is unknown before contact, which is a genuine problem for contracting and data handling. Its Make.com Gold tier is unverifiable, because Make's partner directory returns nothing to a check, and stands as the agency's own claim. And with no Zapier partnership listed, a buyer already standardized on Zapier is in the wrong place. The uptime and task figures are self-reported with no client named behind them.
Pros
Certified on n8n and building on AWS as well as Make.com, so work can extend past what a no-code platform handles alone
States operational figures that matter for production automation: 1.2 million tasks at 99.8% uptime
Publishes a specific sector focus on ecommerce, logistics and SaaS rather than claiming every vertical
Cons
Publishes no location anywhere on its site, so jurisdiction cannot be established before contact
The Make.com Gold tier is the agency's own claim; Make's partner directory renders client-side and returned nothing when checked
No Zapier partnership is listed, which rules it out for a buyer already standardized on Zapier
No headcount and no rate are published, and the task and uptime figures name no client
Best forOperations-heavy businesses standardized on Zapier that want case numbers up front and a named automation lead rather than a ticket queue.
Flow Digital is the choice for a buyer who wants to see what an engagement actually produced. It is the only agency on this page publishing outcome numbers tied to individual clients, and its partner tiers at Zapier, Pipedrive, Airtable and Jotform show working knowledge of the CRM and forms layer around the automation itself, which is where most small-business workflows break. Two things to weigh against that. The center of gravity is Zapier, so a buyer wanting an unbiased read on whether Make.com or n8n fits better should ask elsewhere, and the '#1 rated' line on its site names no source and could not be confirmed against Zapier's directory. It publishes no price, so the first call is a qualifying call. It ranks third because those case numbers are the strongest demonstrated-work evidence here, and only the two listings above it pair evidence with a price a buyer can find.
Pros
Publishes per-client outcome numbers, including a 146% sales increase and 88% less admin time on one engagement
Partner tiers across Zapier, Pipedrive, Airtable and Jotform, covering the CRM and forms layer around the workflow
Offers a fractional Chief Automation Officer, so someone owns the automation after the build
Publishes an HQ, a 2018 founding year and a headcount band, which most of this category does not
Cons
Publishes no pricing of any kind, so budget only surfaces on a call
The '#1 rated Zapier Premier Partner' line on its site names no source and could not be confirmed
Zapier is the anchor credential, which makes a tool-neutral recommendation across Zapier, Make and n8n unlikely
Neither published case study names the client, so the outcome numbers cannot be verified with the business that got them
Best forBuyers with a specific broken or half-finished Zapier build who want one experienced person on it rather than a team.
Luhhu is worth contacting for one specific job: a Zapier build that is broken, or one a previous supplier abandoned half-finished. That is work most agencies would rather not quote on, and a single experienced Zapier partner is arguably the right shape for it. Everything else about the engagement argues for caution on anything larger. It is one person on one platform, so there is no continuity cover and no capacity for parallel workstreams, its Zapier tier is Gold rather than the Platinum most partners here hold, and it publishes no founding year and no rate. The site does not redirect to HTTPS, and the blog now carries syndicated content unrelated to automation, which reads more like link monetization than an active consultancy. Thirteenth is about the thinness of the record and the concentration risk, not a judgment on the Zapier work itself.
Pros
Zapier Gold Solution Partner, a tier listed in Zapier's own expert directory
Explicitly takes on repair work: fixing broken zaps and finishing builds another supplier abandoned
Publishes a named principal, a city and a UK trading entity
Cons
One person on one platform, so there is no cover if the principal is unavailable and no capacity for parallel workstreams
The blog now carries syndicated content unrelated to automation, which reads as link monetization rather than an active practice
No founding year and no rate are published, and the site does not redirect to HTTPS
Gold is a lower Zapier tier than the Platinum most of the Zapier partners listed here hold
Best forSmall Australian businesses that want Zapier workflows plus the reporting layer over them from one hands-on consultant.
That Automation Agency is a sensible option for a small Australian business that wants Zapier workflows plus the Power BI reporting layer over them from one accountable person, and the fractional COO line means it will engage with the operating process rather than just building zaps. Its Zapier Platinum tier is listed in Zapier's directory and its ABN is published, so both the credential and the trading entity check out, which is more than several listings above it manage. The limits are concentration on two axes at once. It presents as a single principal with no published headcount, so there is no cover if that person is unavailable, and the stack is Zapier plus Power BI with no Make.com or n8n, so it cannot compare platforms on a buyer's behalf. No founding year, city or rate is published either, leaving tenure, location and budget to the first call. Twelfth reflects a narrow and largely unevidenced public record.
Pros
Zapier Platinum Solution Partner with a published ABN, so both the credential and the trading entity can be checked
Pairs automation with Power BI dashboards, so the reporting layer comes out of the same engagement
Offers fractional COO time, which is process ownership rather than build and leave
Cons
Presents as a single-principal consultancy with no published headcount, so there is no cover if that person is unavailable
The stack is Zapier plus Power BI with no Make.com or n8n, so it cannot compare platforms on a buyer's behalf
No founding year, city or rate is published, and the claim to be the first APAC Certified Zapier Expert is its own
